BadgerNation Bracketology

(Getty Images)

The chaos of conference play has caused 16 new teams to enter the field, and another team to move into a number one seed for the first time. In his seventh year doing bracketology, BadgerNation proudly welcomes Kyle Reichert to our staff as our resident Bracketologist for the 2013-14 season.

Join the Badger conversation on Facebook! Go to our Facebook page and "like" us!

This Week's Bracket

BadgerNation Bracket - Edition 4

Wisconsin is a number one seed in my latest bracket projection. After wins over Iowa and Illinois, combined with an Ohio State loss to Michigan State, it was clear that the Badgers' body of work has surpassed that of the Buckeyes, who were dropped to a two seed following their loss. This is the first time that I have ever projected Wisconsin as a one seed, and it is exciting to see them play its way into this position. By the looks of the schedule ahead, the Badgers will have plenty of opportunities to solidify this lofty ranking in the weeks to come.

As much of a surprise as Wisconsin's great success has been, the struggles of some traditional powers has been even more unanticipated. Indiana currently finds itself on the outside of the tournament looking up a large hill to get in. Kansas, Kentucky, Duke and Louisville, four teams that have all been projected as one seeds at some point this season, have underachieved on various levels and find themselves all in the 3-5 seed range.

With regard to traditional powers, North Carolina continues to be the most difficult team to understand. The Tar Heels added another head-shaking home loss to their resume, falling to Miami (FL) this week. Their impressive wins will keep them safe, but their terrible losses are preventing them from making much progress with their seed.

This week was a perfect example of the chaos that conference play can create, as the last seven days featured the most movement among the projection so far this year (16 new teams entered the field). Stay tuned for the next bracket release, as I'm sure it will look quite different than this one.

Explanation

There are a lot of misconceptions about making a bracket. Basically, you take the winners of the automatic-bid conferences, then the next best teams that didn't win their conference and rank them 1-68. Once these rankings are done, the teams are split up at increments of 4 into their seeds. The last 4 at-large teams and the last 4 auto bid teams are seeded in pairs, and represent the new "First Four" model, with play-in games on the first Tuesday and Wednesday of the tournament. Once I break the teams up into seeds, it is easy for me to see where one team maybe should be ahead of another. After teams are seeded, I make note of the "first four out" and "next four out" to keep a full radar of teams that are near tournament contention.

One small change to the bracket this year will be the number of auto bids and at-large bids. The breakup of the original Big East resulted in the creation of the new American Athletic Conference (AAC). Because the AAC meets the criteria for an automatic bid, the number of auto bids rose from 31 to 32. That, in turn, shrunk the number of at-large bids from 37 to 36. This really will not have a large impact on the bracket, as the winners of the new Big East and AAC will likely be teams that would have gotten in if the old conference was still in place. This is the second time that a conference breakup has resulted in an increase in auto bids, the first being the splitting of the WAC into the Mountain West about 10 years ago. That was the beginning of the play-in games, as the NCAA didn't want to see the number of at-large bids change out of fear of lowering the quality of the tournament. Since then, the play-in games have grown from one to four, so there is no reason to expand the tournament based on the most recent conference expansion.

As far as selecting teams, my process is not complicated. Remember, I am only selecting 36 teams because of the 32 auto bids. During the season, I use the current conference leaders to determine who my auto bids go to. Once I have these teams selected, I rank them 1-32. I then select the remaining 36 teams based on factors like the RPI, with special focus on certain RPI characteristics like quality wins and strength of schedule. The selection committee looks at each team as an independent in their selection in March, so I try not to let conference affiliation affect my seeding. I have a natural bias towards the Big Ten, simply by virtue of seeing so many Big Ten games in person each season. I do my best not to let this bias be a part of my bracket.

I am interested to see how the shift of power towards the major conferences affects seeding. The Horizon League, Conference USA and the Missouri Valley Conference all lost teams to the redistributed Big East and AAC. There were also some shifts among the low-major conferences that will have minor impacts. Bottom line: previous conference reputations will be more irrelevant than ever and there will be a period of feeling-out with the realignment.

In my opinion, the Big Ten returns as the best conference, but the ACC is not far behind. The AAC and new Big East are about equal, the Big 12 is about their level and the SEC and Pac-12 continue to lag slightly behind, despite having some top-level teams at the top of their conferences. The Atlantic-10 continues its rise and the Mountain West will be as competitive as always.

I'm looking to build on a season in which I correctly predicted 66 of the 68 teams in the field, correctly predicted 22 teams' seeds, got 28 teams predicted within one seed and 12 teams within two seeds.

I'll be releasing a bracket every Friday, after the big Thursday games and before the busy weekends.

BadgerNation.com Recommended Stories


Up Next


Forums


791 Fans online
Join The Conversation

Tweets